Auditing Gain on Bargain Purchase: A Comprehensive Guide for Hong Kong Auditors
As an auditor in Hong Kong, it’s crucial to understand the complexities associated with auditing the gain on bargain purchase. This financial statement line item can be challenging, particularly within the context of Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards (HKFRS). In this blog post, we will explore key aspects to consider when auditing this specific financial statement line item, focusing on risk assessment, internal controls, and audit procedures. Additionally, we will introduce our powerful Audit Program 3.0, which can effectively help CPA firms reduce time costs by 99.99% as all illustrative documentation is generated and customized.
1. Assessing Assertion Level Risks, Inherent Risks, and Control Risks
The first step in auditing gain on bargain purchase is to assess the assertion level risks, inherent risks, and control risks associated with this financial statement line item. When applying the guidance set forth in HKSA 315 (revised) for identifying and evaluating the risks of material misstatement, auditors should consider factors such as the complexity of the client’s business and industry, the occurrence and accuracy of the gain on bargain purchase, and the potential for management override.
To justify the risk levels assigned to each type of risk, auditors should document the client’s specific risk factors and the potential impact on the gain on bargain purchase. It’s important to stay informed about the economic and regulatory environment, as changes in these areas could significantly influence the risk assessment.
The following is a sample of illustrative documentation of the risk assessment process extracted directly from our Audit Program 3.0:
“Assertion Level risk assessment for Gain on bargain purchase
Assertion 1: Occurrence
The recorded gain on bargain purchase represents an actual gain from an acquisition during the period. The company follows set procedures to identify and record gains on bargain purchases in accordance with accounting standards. The risk for the occurrence assertion is assessed as low risk.
Assertion 2: Completeness
All required gains on bargain purchases have been recorded. The company has controls over the identification of acquisitions and review of financial information to ensure all gains are captured. Historical trends indicate that all gains have been properly recorded. The risk for the completeness assertion is assessed as low risk.
Assertion 3: Accuracy
The gain on bargain purchase recorded is accurate based on valuation of assets and liabilities acquired. The valuation models and key assumptions used are reviewed by management. Sensitivity analyses are also performed. The risk for the accuracy assertion is assessed as low risk.
In summary, the overall risk for gain on bargain purchase is assessed as low risk. The company has controls and procedures in place for identifying and measuring gains from bargain purchases. The risk assessment has been documented in compliance with relevant auditing standards and is sufficiently justified to allow another auditor to reach the same conclusion. The overall risk level for this class of transaction is low risk.”
2. Understanding the Design and Implementation of Internal Controls
As part of the requirements set forth in HKSA 315 (revised), auditors must gain a deep understanding of the client’s internal controls surrounding gain on bargain purchase. This involves evaluating the design and implementation of control activities, as well as the frequency, type of control, and personnel responsible for each activity.
When documenting internal controls, it’s important to provide a clear, step-by-step description of the business process for gain on bargain purchase. This should include details on the initiation, authorization, and recording of transactions, as well as the periodic review and reconciliation of the gain on bargain purchase. Moreover, auditors should scrutinize the segregation of duties and consider how the client’s IT systems and applications contribute to an effective control environment.
3. Designing Audit Responses and Procedures
After identifying and assessing the risks and understanding the client’s internal controls, the next step is to design audit responses that address each assertion level risk. To achieve this, auditors must carefully consider the factors influencing gain on bargain purchase and develop appropriate audit procedures.
In documenting these procedures, it’s crucial to provide a comprehensive explanation of the steps involved, the documents to be checked, and any necessary confirmations or discussions with management. For example, auditors may need to test the accuracy and completeness of the gain on bargain purchase, verify the appropriateness of the acquisition methodology used, and assess the reasonableness of management’s assumptions and judgments related to the gain on bargain purchase.
The following is a sample of illustrative documentation of the design of audit procedures extracted directly from our Audit Program 3.0:
“Assertion 1: Occurrence
Audit Procedure 1.1: Obtain a detailed schedule of gain on bargain purchases recorded during the financial year. Select a sample of recorded gains and verify the existence of the related business combinations by reviewing the purchase agreements, acquisition contracts, and other relevant supporting documentation.
Audit Procedure 1.2: For the selected sample, review the client’s calculation of gain on bargain purchase in accordance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards, and ensure that it is based on valid circumstances, such as a distressed sale, incorrect estimates, or other factors resulting in a bargain purchase.
Audit Procedure 1.3: Inquire with management about the process for identifying and recording gain on bargain purchases, and evaluate the design and implementation of internal controls related to the occurrence of gain on bargain purchases.
Assertion 2: Completeness
Audit Procedure 2.1: Perform a walkthrough of the client’s process for identifying and recording gain on bargain purchases. Check for any potential gaps or inconsistencies in the process that could result in unrecorded gains or losses.
Audit Procedure 2.2: Reconcile the total gain on bargain purchases recorded in the general ledger to the detailed schedule of gain on bargain purchases obtained in Audit Procedure 1.1. Investigate any discrepancies identified during the reconciliation.
Assertion 3: Accuracy
Audit Procedure 3.1: For the selected sample of recorded gain on bargain purchases, recalculate the gain amounts using the relevant provisions of Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards and the client’s calculation methodology. Compare the recalculated amounts to the recorded amounts and investigate any significant discrepancies.
Audit Procedure 3.2: Review the client’s assumptions, estimates, and valuation techniques used in calculating the gain on bargain purchases and assess their reasonableness and consistency with industry norms and the client’s historical practices.
Assertion 4: Cut-off
Audit Procedure 4.1: For the selected sample of recorded gain on bargain purchases, inspect the underlying business combination transactions to ensure that they are recorded in the appropriate accounting period by verifying the transaction date, agreement date, or contract date, as applicable.
Audit Procedure 4.2: Review the client’s procedures for identifying and recording gain on bargain purchases that relate to the period-end cut-off and assess their adequacy in ensuring that gain on bargain purchases are recorded in the correct accounting period.
Conclusion:
The audit procedures designed above are in response to the low risk-level on the assertions identified on the class of transaction of gain on bargain purchases. By performing these procedures, the overall risk level should remain at Low Risk. These procedures are in compliance with Hong Kong Standards on Auditing (HKSA) 230 Audit Documentation and HKSA 220 Quality Management for an Audit of Financial Statements.”
Revolutionizing the Audit Process with Audit Program 3.0
Navigating the complexities of auditing gain on bargain purchase under HKFRS can be challenging. However, with our innovative Audit Program 3.0, CPA firms can significantly reduce time costs by 99.99%. Our automated program generates customized, illustrative audit programs, risk assessments, and documentation of internal controls relevant to any client industry and principal activity. By streamlining the audit process, Audit Program 3.0 allows auditors to focus on ensuring the highest level of audit quality and compliance.
In conclusion, auditing gain on bargain purchase under HKFRS requires a thorough understanding of risks, internal controls, and audit procedures. By following the guidelines set out in this blog post, auditors can navigate the intricacies of this financial statement line item and uphold the rigorous standards set by the AFRC. Moreover, with the unparalleled efficiency of Audit Program 3.0, CPA firms can confidently tackle even the most challenging audits and deliver exceptional results.